Superheater tubes

Power & EnergyOsaka, JP

STAR (+4 pts)
APPROVED

Basic Information

Overview

Fabrication of Alloy 622 cladded tubes for a superheater in a biomass boiler

Industry

Power & Energy

Location

Osaka, JP

Component/Workpiece

Superheater tubes

Business Type

Integra - Workshop

Job Type

New

OEM

TAKUMA Co., Ltd.

Type of Wear

Corrosion
erosion

Tags

power generation applications
superheater tubes
gmaw
ni-based alloy

Base Metal

Low-alloy steel(STBA12)

General Dimensions (mm)

Ø43 mm × t4.5 mm × L2,000 mm × 20 pcs

Problem Description

The challenge the customer was facing

Tube degradation occurs due to corrosion and erosion caused by steam blowing from soot blowers and the flow of bed material. Although the tubes are coated with Ni-Cr-based thermal spray, cracking and delamination of the coating occur.

Previous Service Life

4mo

Welding Alloys Solution

How WA solved the challenge

Replacement with Alloy 622 cladded tubes. Single-layer cladding Cladding thickness: approx. 3 mm

Product Category

Wear Pipes & Tubes

Product Description

Alloy 622 cladding

Job Duration

1mo

Technical Advantages

By using Alloy 622, which contains a higher Mo content than Alloy 625, improved resistance to high-temperature environments can be achieved. In addition, cladding with a Ni-based alloy enhances corrosion resistance. Furthermore, cladding provides stronger bond strength and better ductility compared to thermal spray coatings.

Service Life

4y

Images (1)

Photos and visuals for this case study

Case study image 1

Cost Reduction Analysis

Annual Cost Before

¥6,000,000.00

Annual Cost After

¥758,250.00

Annual Savings

¥5,241,750.00

87.0% reduction

Annual Cost Comparison
Previous Solution¥6,000,000.00
WA Solution¥758,250.00

Cost Breakdown

Part Information
Cost of Part (A):¥2,000,000.00
Cost of WA Solution (B):¥3,033,000.00
Parts Used/Year (E):3
Solution Lifetime Comparison
Previous Solution:4.1 months
WA Solution:4.0 years
WA solution lasts 12.0x longer!
Before (Previous Solution)
Maintenance/Repair (F):-
Disassembly Cost (G):-
Downtime/Event (H):-
After (WA Solution)
Maintenance/Repair (F):-
Disassembly Cost (G):-
Downtime/Event (H):-
Formula Used

Annual Cost = (A × E) + (E − 1) × (F + G + H)

Where: A = Cost of Part, E = Parts/Year, F = Maintenance, G = Disassembly, H = Downtime

Welding Procedure Specification (WPS)

1 layer(s) documented

Submission Details

Contributor

Yuuki Shimizu

yuuki.shimizu@waj.co.jp

Created

April 30, 2026

Submitted

April 30, 2026

Approved By

Bastien Gerard

May 3, 2026