VRM Table Repair

Cement & MineralsSt.Genevieve, MO, CA

Originally written in Dutch|Translated to EnglishView original

Showing translated English content

STAR (+4 pts)
APPROVED

Basic Information

Overview

The competitor over built 4 OK Mill Tables by 25mm. WA Integra Team was able to come up with a solution on the fly to set up a Automated Gouging set up using WA D-2 equipment.

Industry

Cement & Minerals

Location

St.Genevieve, MO, CA

Component/Workpiece

VRM Table Repair

Business Type

Integra - On Site

Job Type

Repair

OEM

Flsmidth

Type of Wear

Abrasion
Impact

Base Metal

Hi Chrome

General Dimensions (mm)

3.6m Table

Problem Description

The challenge the customer was facing

The problem was the competitor overbuilt all 4 tables by 25mm. Learning how to automate gouge not only a table but a radiused one in-situ was a steep task given this was a process the crew was new to.

Previous Service Life

2mo

Competitor

Alabama Wear Services

Welding Alloys Solution

How WA solved the challenge

WA Integra used GW-O (3.2) D-2 millkits with air knives attached to torches angled downhill on radius allowing them to gouge/cut the 25mm of overbuild in 48hrs. The table was then rebuilt using Mill 415.

Product Category

Integra Services

Product Description

For Gouging Repairs - GW-O (3.2) For Welding Repair - Mill 415 (3.2) Build Up

Job Duration

1w 6d

Technical Advantages

WA Gouging Solution allowed for the team to rebuild 4 OK Mill tables that otherwise could not continue to grind clinker efficiently. I see this as a HUGE Technical Advantage as NO one in the Hardfacing US Cement Market is doing this or has the equipment to do such work.

Service Life

1y

Images (3)

Photos and visuals for this case study

Case study image 1Case study image 2Case study image 3

Cost Reduction Analysis

Annual Cost Before

$400,000.00

Annual Cost After

$156,666.67

Annual Savings

$243,333.33

60.0% reduction

Annual Cost Comparison
Previous Solution$400,000.00
WA Solution$156,666.67

Cost Breakdown

Part Information
Cost of Part (A):$100,000.00
Cost of WA Solution (B):$235,000.00
Parts Used/Year (E):4
Solution Lifetime Comparison
Previous Solution:2.0 months
WA Solution:1.0 years
WA solution lasts 6.0x longer!
Before (Previous Solution)
Maintenance/Repair (F):-
Disassembly Cost (G):-
Downtime/Event (H):-
After (WA Solution)
Maintenance/Repair (F):-
Disassembly Cost (G):-
Downtime/Event (H):-
Formula Used

Annual Cost = (A × E) + (E − 1) × (F + G + H)

Where: A = Cost of Part, E = Parts/Year, F = Maintenance, G = Disassembly, H = Downtime

Additional Benefits

Now that the existing over built material has been removed by gouging the tables have been brought back to OEM profile allowing for better cement production. The removal of the old material also gave solid base materail to rebuild on which should allow a much better wear life.

Welding Procedure Specification (WPS)

1 layer(s) documented

Submission Details

Contributor

Ian Turner

ian.turner@welding-alloys.com

Created

April 1, 2026

Submitted

April 1, 2026

Approved By

Bastien Gerard

April 1, 2026